|
Action:
Urge the President (202/456-1414) and your members
of Congress (202/224-3121) to step back from the brink
of war; and to work with other nations and the UN
to pursue alternatives to address Iraq's threats.
The Issue:
Both the Senate and the House of Representatives are
expected to debate resolutions authorizing the use
of military force against Iraq as early s the week
of September 30. President Bush sent Congress an expansively
worded draft resolution that would authorize him to
use all means that he determines to be appropriate,
including force, in order to enforce United Nations
Security Council Resolutions, defend the national
security interests of the United States against the
threat posed by Iraq, and restore international peace
and security in the region. House and Senate leadership
are currently negotiating with the Administration
to develop compromise language that would authorize
the use of force against Iraq. Negotiations could
be completed in days and debate could then begin.
USCCB Response:
In a September 13th letter (www.usccb.org/sdwp) to
President Bush, Bishop Wilton D. Gregory, President
of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops
(USCCB) said: "We conclude, based on the facts
that are known to us, that a preemptive, unilateral
use of force (to overthrow the government of Iraq
is difficult to justify at this time." Bishop
Gregory welcomed, however, the President's efforts
to focus the world's attention on the need to address
Iraq's repression and pursuit of weapons of mass destruction
in defiance of the United Nations.
Rational:
The United States and the international community
have two grave moral obligations: to protect the common
good against Iraqi threats to peace and to do so in
a way that conforms to traditional moral norms. The
USCCB fears that resort to force, under these circumstances,
would not meet the strict conditions necessary to
override the strong presumption against the use of
military force.
- The Iraqi threat. One should have no illusions
about the behavior or intentions of the Iraqi government.
The international community must mobilize to ensure
that the Iraqi leadership ceases its internal repression,
ends it threats to its neighbors, stops any support
for terrorism, abandons its efforts to develop weapons
of mass destruction, and complies with UN resolutions.
- Just cause. Reflecting widely accepted moral and
legal restraints, Catholic teaching limits just
cause for military attack to cases in which "the
damage inflicted by the aggressor on the nation
or community of nations [is] lasting, grave and
certain" (Catechism of the Catholic Church
#2309). Therefore, the Bishops "find it difficult
to justify extending the war on terrorism to Iraq,
absent clear and adequate evidence of Iraqi involvement
in the attacks of September 11th or of an imminent
attack of a grave nature."
- Legitimate authority. Moral credibility also depends
on whether there is legitimate authority for using
force. Decisions of such gravity require compliance
with U.S. constitutional imperatives, broad consensus
within our nation, and some form of international
sanction, preferably by the UN Security Council.
- Probability of success and proportionality. The
use of force must have "serious prospects for
success" and "must not produce evils and
disorders graver than the evil to be eliminated"
(Catechism #2309). War against Iraq could provoke
the very attacks it is meant to prevent and could
have unpredictable consequences not only for Iraq,
but also for peace and stability elsewhere in the
Middle East.
- Norms governing the conduct of war. The use of
massive military force to remove the current government
of Iraq could have incalculable effects on a civilian
population that has suffered so much war, repression,
and a debilitating embargo.
- Alternatives to war. There are no easy answers
to the threat posed by the Iraqi government, but
we must actively pursue alternatives to war, including:
- Continued diplomatic efforts aimed, in part, at
resuming rigorous, meaningful inspections;
- Effective enforcement of the military embargo,
and other legitimate ways to contain and deter aggressive
Iraqi actions.
- Maintenance of political sanctions and much more
carefully focused economic sanctions that do not
threaten the lives of innocent Iraqis;
- Non-military support for Iraqis who offer democratic
alternatives.
Action Requested:
Urge the President (202/456-1414) and your members
of Congress (Capitol switchboard 202/224-3121) to
step back from the brink of war and to work with other
nations and the UN to pursue alternatives to address
Iraq's threats.
|